Schedule 7 goes

As regular readers will know, I have been campaigning against Schedule 7 of the Public Bodies Bill.  This is a ‘Henry VIII’ provision, enabling ministers to change primary legislation by orders (that is, secondary legislation).   Some schedules of the Bill list public bodies that are to be abolished and others that are to have their functions amended or merged.   Schedule 7, however, comprises public bodies that the Government have yet to decide what to do with them.   This puts them in a form of living uncertainty – ‘death row’ as one peer put it.  They include some quasi-judicial bodies. 

I was among those peers voicing objections to the Schedule when the Bill came up for Second Reading and have been campaiging against it since.  I tabled motions to remove the Schedule (and Clause 11 that gives effect to it).   Opposition to the Schedule came from all parts of the House – the Opposition, the cross-benches (former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf, made a powerful speech on Second Reading), and from peers on the coalition benches – I have been approached by various colleagues who are opposed to or worried about the clause. 

Had the Government persisted with the Schedule, I intended to push it to a vote and was confident there would be a majority to get rid of it.  In the event, the Government have bowed to the inevitable.  On Monday, the minister, Lord Taylor of Holbeach, announced that the Government accepted that the Schedule should be removed from the Bill.  He has therefore added his name to the motions to take Clause 11 and Schedule 7 out of the Bill.  This is a great step forward and deals with the principal (though not the only) problem in the Bill.

Advertisements

About Lord Norton

Professor of Government at Hull University, and Member of the House of Lords
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Schedule 7 goes

  1. Carl.H says:

    Sense seems to have prevailed to a degree then.

    My Lord, it appears consistantly that what we are hearing is that a majority of bills from this Government are hastily prepared infact ill-prepared. Is the other place actually scrutinising anything ?

    • Lord Norton says:

      Carl.H: In this case, the other place is innocent inasmuch as it has not had chance yet to scrutinise the Public Bodies Bill: it was introduced in the Lords, so we have been busy working on it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s