Fifteen years in the Lords

Introduction to LordsI was introduced into the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 October 1998, so today is the fifteenth anniversary of my introduction.  The picture (right) was the formal photograph taken in the Robing Room following the ceremony.  For the introduction, my supporters were Lord Newton of Braintree (Tony Newton), former Leader of the House of Commons, and Lord Weatherill, former Speaker of the House of Commons, both distinguished parliamentarians – sadly neither no longer with us – and chosen to reflect my academic interest in Parliament. 

Shortly after I joined the Lords, I was invited by William Hague, then Leader of the Opposition, to chair the Conservative Party’s Commission to Strengthen Parliament – we reported in 2000 – and in 2001 I was appointed by the House to chair the newly-created Constitution Committee.  As regular readers will know, most of my parliamentary activity has taken the form of committee work rather than chamber activity.  I tend to be selective when speaking in the chamber on the grounds that one is more effective by choosing one’s contributions carefully rather than indiscriminately. 

The fifteen years have flown by.  At least  I like to think that I still look pretty much as in the photograph.  (In facial appearance that is; I don’t mean to imply I regularly go about wearing ermine.)   Life continues to be the equivalent of keeping several plates spinning on the top of sticks, though I like to think with a little more purpose than keeping plates spinning….

About Lord Norton

Professor of Government at Hull University, and Member of the House of Lords
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Fifteen years in the Lords

  1. James Hand says:

    Happy anniversary!
    The average attendance for that session, 15 years ago, was 446. The near halving of members in Nov 1999 saw average attendance drop by 100 or so (although average attendance by hereditaries doubled following their reduction in number) but it has been increasing steadily since then and now is above that number.
    The two PMBs this session may help to reduce numbers a little, but with a small amendment we could have the long-awaited stage 2 reform, retain most of the virtues of the current House and and add a element of democracy as sought by Nick Clegg (though not in the way he originally intended) as detailed in a new blog post at Halsbury’s Law Exchange –
    (Hope you don’t mind the self-publicity!)

  2. Croft says:

    ” (In facial appearance that is; I don’t mean to imply I regularly go about wearing ermine.)”

    Thus denying readers the amusement of thinking you wore your robes as a dressing gown at home 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s