A tragic week

The security services do a remarkable job and have managed to prevent a number of attacks on Parliament.  There is always the danger that one or more will succeed.  Wednesday saw such an attack, with a tragic loss of lives.   Whenever such attacks happen – the Palace has witnessed IRA bomb attacks as well as the assassination of MP Airey Neave within the precincts – there is a review of security, but with the recognition that Parliament has to continue operating as a Parliament and be accessible to the public.   There is the obvious concern not only with the Palace itself, but also the surrounding area.  One aspect to be considered is pedestrianizing the area around the Palace, not least St Margaret’s Street and part of Parliament Square.  As for immediate changes, these will be operational matters for the security services.

I had a fairly packed programme lined up for the week.  On Tuesday, I had my students down to Westminster for the principal field trip of the year.  It encompassed a range of events.  It is an annual event and for as long as I can remember I have organised it for a Wednesday.  This year I decided to switch it to a Tuesday as it reduced clashes with other events.  By the end of Wednesday, I was more than relieved that I had made the switch.

On Wednesday morning, the Constitution Committee took evidence from the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas.  His comments attracted considerable media attention.  (You can watch his evidence here.)   After lunch I had a meeting of the Executive of the Association of Conservative Peers and then a meeting of the Association.

It was when I got back to my office after the ACP meeting that I saw on the TV screens the events unfolding outside.  We got instructions to remain in our present location.  There were three of us in the office, soon joined by a fourth colleague.  We were in lock down for about four hours.  We were told to stay away from the windows, though given the size of the windows one didn’t need to be near them to see outside.  Eventually, armed police arrived to escort everyone on our floor to Westminster Hall.  A good many parliamentarians, staff and visitors had been taken there much earlier and then to Westminster Abbey.  (I kept getting text messages from a friend in the Abbey.)  I anticipated we may be in the Hall until  late in the evening and was just planning to send messages cancelling classes in Hull the following day when we were told it was possible to leave.  It was just in time to enable me to get to the station in time for the last train.  I decided to travel back, though did wrestle with whether that was the right decision and whether it would be more appropriate to stay, not least to be in the chamber for the following morning.

Parliament is obviously an iconic target and needs protecting.  PC Keith Palmer gave his life protecting it.  Three others died not because they were in Parliament, but because they were making their way across Westminster Bridge.   We have to do what we can to prevent such attacks and that obviously entails changes, but at the same time we have to try to ensure that we do not make them on such a scale that it means that those who seek to terrorise succeed in their aims.

Advertisements

About Lord Norton

Professor of Government at Hull University, and Member of the House of Lords
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to A tragic week

  1. You have thoughts, prayers, good will and best wishes from here and elsewhere.

  2. Reblogged this on Franksummers3ba's Blog and commented:
    An important contact in the formation of this blog posted this.

  3. Croft says:

    I think i’ve commented on this blog before that many years ago (when IRA attacks were ongoing) I was surprised just how little security there was to get into the palace and indeed to get to PMQs (I had no checks whatsoever, frankly I could have made my own pass: though as it wasn’t checked I might as well have carried a Dennis the Menace Fan Club Badge).

    It does seem (if reported correctly) ill thought out to open the gates for the divisions so ministers aren’t kept waiting outside – a security valid precaution – that the obvious danger of moving the security risk inside the gates wasn’t countered with permanent armed officer inside. I don’t see there needs to be one on the gate itself

    I wasn’t sure if – as the phrase goes – I should laugh or cry at the LCJs remarks. I don’t think judges attacking politicians does them any favours at all and at worse looks deeply problematic when they demand protection from attacks themselves. Judges have a near unique ability to attack, and indeed libel, individuals behind the immunity of the court proceedings. There exists no (real) accountability except the press.
    Liz Truss’s remarks that “I think it is dangerous for a government minister to say, ‘this is an acceptable headline and this isn’t an acceptable headline,’ because I am a huge believer in the independence of the judiciary. I am also a very strong believer in the free press.” seemed fair to me.

  4. maude elwes says:

    My comment was deemed unacceptable as I am to the right of Attila the Hun on this. And that is how I shall remain.

  5. tizres says:

    “…we have to try to ensure that we do not make them on such a scale that it means that those who seek to terrorise succeed in their aims.”

    For quite some time, it has been entirely predictable that terrorism would be scaled and, so, aimed at the unprotectable. If it the wish of those who demand access to everything and everyone at their personal and convenient time of choice, then more of these attacks will take place by lone nutters with zero aims but who make their grievances fit the latest terrorist meme.

  6. Croft says:

    LN: Going back to your post on conventions – it seems to me that the Lords (office holder) by-elections are establishing a new one. If i’m correct every one has seen the old peer replaced by a peer of the same party and in most cases a form of buggins turn. Lord Colgrain has just missed out before. Looking at recent votes the Earl of Stockton and Harrowby look odds on in due course. Then again Lord Bethell, who I know very little about, suddenly gained lots of votes…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s