Delaying restoration and renewal

I have previously posted about the need for both Houses to decant the Palace of Westminster in order for the restoration and renewal (R&R) programme to be undertaken.  With each passing week, the Palace shows more signs of its ageing infrastructure.  This is apparent in some public areas (areas closed off for work, creaking floorboards in the committee corridor), but even more so in areas not seen by the public, not least in terms of the basement.

It is impossible not to notice the work being undertaken just to keep the Palace ticking over.  Anyone looking at the Palace from outside can see the scaffolding and coverings adorning parts of the building.  It is even more apparent to anyone walking through the courtyards.  The possibility of some catastrophic failure gets greater month by month.

As I mentioned in my earlier post, both Houses were supposed to have taken a decision on the various options for R&R earlier in 2016.  The votes were postponed until earlier this year.  In the event, the holding of a general election has put the decision back.  It is not clear how soon a vote will be held in the new Parliament.  The Government and parliamentary authorities keep passing the buck.

Even if both Houses do get round to voting for a full decant, for the reasons given in my earlier post, the election this year may have the effect of pushing a decant even further back than the expected 2022.  It was initially thought it could be 2020, but there was a view that MPs newly elected that year ought to have the opportunity to spend a year or so in the Commons before Members moved out, so it was put back to 2022 (aided by the delay in the two Houses taking a decision).  With the next election after this June now scheduled to take place in May 2022, that may mean it being pushed back to 2024.

One wonders how much of the Palace has to start falling down, or which essential service has to seize up, before Government and the parties recognise the need to act.

About Lord Norton

Professor of Government at Hull University, and Member of the House of Lords
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Delaying restoration and renewal

  1. tizres says:

    What are the stances from the relevant unions? Based on descriptions from various sources, it is surprising that staff haven’t walked out.

  2. Croft says:

    “creaking floorboards in the committee corridor”

    Gosh – my floorboards creak – never thought they needed restoration 🙂

  3. Croft says:

    OT: LN: Purdah seems a mess atm. Its started for the gov, but not for parliament. So we seem to have a farce of reports (with partisan intent – to influence the general election) attacking the government which it can’t respond to.

    Kinda feel we need a level playing field one way or another.

  4. The Duke of Waltham says:

    At this rate, by the time works begin the Parliamentary Archives may well have prepared their new home… I understand they are looking to relocate, and it sounds stupid to move them out of the Victoria Tower, then back in and then back out again into their new premises.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s