What goes on behind the scenes…

In an earlier post, I drew attention to my article in Parliamentary Affairs on the importance of informal space in legislatures – places where members gather informally (dining and tea rooms, division lobbies, corridors) and in which discussion between MPs can serve as means of socialisation, information exchange, lobbying, and mobilising political support.  The article was published online last year and I am pleased to report has just appeared in print in the March issue of the journal.

In terms of mobilising political support, the article draws out the extent to which the neglect of informal space contributed to the loss of the Conservative party leadership by both Edward Heath and Margaret Thatcher.  Their loss of support clearly had major political consequences.

The publication of the article is timely given current events.  Developments in the House of Commons over Brexit can only partially be explained in terms of what goes on in public space, that is, the chamber and committee rooms.  The cameras have focused on debates and votes in the Commons.  However, what goes on in both private space – not least meetings of the 1922 Committee – and informal space is equally crucial for determining outcomes.  Informal space is especially important inasmuch as it not publicly visible and, therefore, reportable.  What is formally private space is not always that private.  Meetings of the 1922 Committee are formally private, but in practice proceedings are quickly leaked to the press.  Indeed, at the meeting on 27 March, when Theresa May said she would be willing to step down from the premiership, news of her announcement was being carried by the media before the meeting had even ended.  The value of conversations in the tea rooms and corridors is that they are not usually seen or leaked to the press.  They may be seen by whips and Parliamentary Private Secretaries, who hover for the purpose of seeing who is saying what and to who, but they form part of the deliberations within parties (and sometimes, as now, across them).  What is discussed may lead to a change in behaviour by members.

As the examples of Heath and Thatcher demonstrate, party leaders cannot afford to neglect informal space.  Theresa May is not a natural when it comes to utilising such space, but at times like this, she and her allies may find it essential.

About Lord Norton

Professor of Government at Hull University, and Member of the House of Lords
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to What goes on behind the scenes…

  1. Stephen MacLean says:

    One fairly recent biographer of Disraeli wrote that he would never have been caught out in the Profumo affair the way Macmillian had been; Dizzy loved to frequent parties and gatherings and take in the gossip, and would have known about — and addressed — the scandal before it took down his Ministry.
    As a ‘WTO Brexiteer’, too, I fault the current impasse (in part) on Brexiteer MPs failing to talk up its benefits and allaying the fears of its opponents in Parliament, and wonder, in the light of what Lord Norton writes about ‘private spaces’, whether this was an avenue they sadly overlooked.

  2. maud elwes says:

    ‘Theresa May is not a natural when it comes to utilising such space, but at times like this, she and her allies may find it essential.’

    This person is not a natural, period. And at times like this, a wobbler spins out of control.

    What has happened to Cometh the Hour, Cometh the Man?

  3. maude elwes says:

    @ LN:

    Our country is in freefall, you all have a responsibility to put us out of our misery. Clearly there is an absence in our parliament of capable adults equipped to run any country. Which is openly obvious via the exposed enormous fear of MP’s and government at the prospect of being out of EU control. They simply cannot cope due to being totally reliant on a bent Brussels for too many years.

    It must be faced and quickly, the choices made in selection so far are completely out of touch with the electorate. And the spouting of what they ‘think’ is being put forward by the latest voting pattern are outrageous. Parliament must accept they will not win against this swell of rejection toward their absurd, infantile policies, presently on offer to the people and give way to those who can envision an adult future for us.

    For God’s sake, move on before we are completely done for. Only a modern nursery school is the equivalent of what we are being put through today. Get real.

  4. Pingback: The unclubbable Prime Minister | The Norton View

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s