The unclubbable Prime Minister

In my earlier post on the importance of informal space in Parliament, I noted that, ‘as the examples of Edward Heath and Margaret Thatcher demonstrate, party leaders cannot afford to neglect informal space.  Theresa May is not a natural when it comes to utilising such space, but at times like this, she and her allies may find it essential.’

As Laura Kuenssberg of the BBC reports, the PM tended to make a virtue of the fact she was not a clubbable person – ‘At the start she boasted about not being a creature of Westminster’s bars and cliques’ – and continues ‘But it meant this very private politician had few true friends to help when things turned sour, and neither the powers of patronage, nor the capability to schmooze or arm twist to get people around to her point of view.’

Ministers may be good at performing in the chamber and in committee – what I have termed formal space – but to succeed in politics that is necessary, but it is not sufficient.  It is what goes on in the tea and dining rooms, the corridors, and even the division lobbies that can affect their future success.  They need to be seen and to listen to backbenchers. Knowing the mood and building up goodwill is important.  A good rule of politics is to make your friends before you need them.  Neglecting informal space leaves politicians vulnerable when they come under pressure.  Theresa May has spent her premiership under pressure.  She failed to learn the lesson of her predecessors.  She has been another Heath in never making use of informal space, rather than a Thatcher or Major, who did recognise its importance but who found being Prime Minister too demanding to continue mixing with backbenchers on a regular basis.  A good rule for any Prime Minister is never to neglect the corridors of the Palace of Westminster.

About Lord Norton

Professor of Government at Hull University, and Member of the House of Lords
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The unclubbable Prime Minister

  1. William MacDougall says:

    Does the new Leader of the Conservative Party automatically become PM? Does he or she have to be explicitly approved by Parliament, or merely fail to lose an explicit no confidence vote?

    • Lord Norton says:

      No vote is required to confirm a new PM and Government. Confidence is taken to exist unless the House votes otherwise. Once a new leader is elected, the assumption is that they command a majority (Cons + DUP) and hence will be invited to form a government.

  2. Mark Shephard says:

    Brexit comes in 1000s of flavours, and many seem to know what flavour the public selected even if politicians are divided over the flavours they think the public want. In turn, I wonder if even the most clubtastic of leaders will still fall on the Brexit sword…

  3. Lord Norton says:

    Being clubbable will help, but is a tool in the leader’s arsenal rather than the whole toolkit!

  4. maude elwes says:

    Well, we now know who will be put forward as possible PM for Conservative members to choose their new leader. And if it wasn’t so nauseatingly tragic, the howl of laughter would be heard in hell. Hunt and Gove. Good God, have mercy on my soul! A pair of May’s merry men. What a surprise.

  5. Pingback: Effective prime ministerial leadership? | The Norton View

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s