On the continuing theme of ownership of process, Barry Winetrobe has an interesting post on the Dale & Co blog as to who controls backbench time in the House of Commons. The Backbench Business Committee may have selected for debate the issue of a referendum on continued membership of the EU, but the Government appears to have moved the date to meet its own convenience.
Archives
- March 2024
- February 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
Surely the answer is for the Backbench Business Committee to schedule something else for the time slot they originally had allocated to the referendum debate. If it was moved by the government to a time outside their normal control. The government can be seen to have adopted the debate, thus freeing up the backbench time for something else.
Monday or Thursday, sadly I can’t go to the ‘mass lobby’ anyway due to labs.
Depending on how my MP votes on Monday will determine whether or not I can bring myself to vote for her again. All my early morning starts and hand injuries from stuffing leaflets through letter boxes in the run-up to the General election may have been a waste.
I don’t think MPs realise quite how strong public opinion is on this issue. One would think with boundary changes coming up, they would be more concerned about keeping a seat than they are about getting a front bench job!
“Regular readers of this Blog may know of my view of the insidious effect on Parliament of this Government’s e-petitions gimmick.”
So goes the opening para by Mr Winetrobe. However, the most popular e-petition on the gvt site asks, “Britain wants referendum to leave EU” and has attracted, to date, 36,702 votes, nowhere near the 100,000 barrier. Has the site taken down another, more popular, petition?
Apologies, the third sentence should read, ” However, the most popular, relevant, e-petition…”
The EU referendum petition which led to the debate on Monday was paper-based. I know because 20 of my friends and family and I willingly signed it and posted it back.
I thought for a while on the site the most popular petition was on the Hilsborough disaster? A debate on the subject has now been agreed to, which is probably why it’s been removed.
It can’t be long before the EU gets another 100,000 ‘signatures’ and, surely, another debate. Maybe our government will have seen sense by then and actually allow a conscience vote. And maybe Labour, realising they need to win back popular support, will become eurosceptic once again.
Thanks, Chris, I appreciate the info. Is there more online?
PS The current No.1 on the site is, “Convicted London rioters should loose [sic] all benefits.”, with 248,229 signatures. The Hillsborough petition remains at #2 and begs the question, when should it be removed? http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions
Ah, in that case I’m probably not quite right, ladytizzy.
The (uncorrected) transcript of the BBC meeting, 18 October.
David Nuttall: …Various organisations have organised both paper and online petitions calling for such a referendum. Between them they have collected more than 100,000 names.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmbackben/ucbbc15658/ucbbc01.htm
It is quite clear that MPs have been quite happy to allow the lie (that the names came from the gvt e-petition site) to continue. The gvt really needs to get better PR.
Hmmm, what is going on? From a PA release, 8 September:
However, Commons leader Sir George Young has apparently assured the Europe campaigners that traditional pen-and-ink versions will be treated the same.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/9835587
The original question posed by this post – Who controls backbench time? – has got murkier.